Download Episode.

Scott talks with journalist Mohamed Elmaazi about the latest Assange hearing before the UK High Court. The hearing, which took place on Tuesday and Wednesday of last week, saw the Assange team requesting the ability to make an appeal on the order extraditing the Wikileaks founder to the United States. Elmaazi, who attended the trial, explains the arguments each side is using at this stage. He and Scott also take a step back and talk about how ridiculous this case against Assange is, bringing up and shooting down all the common myths used to smear this heroic journalist.

Discussed on the show:

• “Assange Is No ‘Ordinary Journalist’: US Opposes Request For Appeal” (The Dissenter)
• “UK High Court Finally Hears Assange’s Request For An Appeal” (The Dissenter)

Mohamed Elmaazi is a journalist who has covered all of Julian Assange’s hearings. His work has appeared in The Dissenter, Consortium News, Jacobite and Electronic Intifada. He is the new editor-in-chief of Truth Defence.

This episode of the Scott Horton Show is sponsored by: Moon Does Artisan Coffee; Roberts and Robers Brokerage Incorporated; Tom Woods’ Liberty Classroom; Libertas Bella; ExpandDesigns.com/Scott.

Get Scott’s interviews before anyone else! Subscribe to the Substack.

Shop Libertarian Institute merch or donate to the show through Patreon, PayPal or Bitcoin: 1DZBZNJrxUhQhEzgDh7k8JXHXRjY

James Ostrowski, a lawyer and author from Buffalo, New York, discusses his new book “The Impeachment of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton: for High Crimes in Syria and Libya;” and why critics of Hillary’s role in Benghazi would be well served to take a broader look at the Libyan war.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Anthony Walker, a former Army psychological operations specialist who served in Afghanistan and Yemen, discusses the unnecessary death and destruction caused by JSOC’s direct action task force in Afghanistan; and how this brutal program has left Afghans distrustful of their own government and made nation-building all but impossible.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Adam Johnson, a contributing writer for Alternet, discusses the US media’s constant vilification of Donald Trump in words and images; The Daily Beast’s accusations that Trump is like Richard Nixon, Joseph Goebbels, Stalin, Nero, and the Ayatollah; and Slate’s hit piece that implies Trump is Vladimir Putin’s puppet being used to destroy the West.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Jeffrey Carr, a cyber intelligence expert and CEO of Taia Global, Inc., discusses his fact-checking of Josh Marshall’s TalkingPointsMemo article that claims a close alliance between Trump and Putin; and why the individuals blaming Russia for the DNC email hack are more motivated by politics than solid evidence.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Larisa Alexandrovna Horton, an investigative journalist formerly with Raw Story, discusses how the 28 pages of the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11 terrorist attacks – finally released in redacted form to the public after 14 years of secrecy – make a convincing case that the hijackers had “babysitters” paid and instructed by top Saudi government officials.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Daniel Lazare, author of The Frozen Republic: How the Constitution Is Paralyzing Democracy, discusses the beheading of a 12 year old boy by US-backed Syrian “moderate” rebels; the Obama administration’s PR spin to deflect blame and run out the clock until the story is forgotten; and the many questions regarding Saudi Arabia’s involvement in 9/11 that weren’t answered by the “28 pages.”

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Marc Hyden, a coordinator at Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, discusses the libertarian/conservative case for abolishing capital punishment; and the big difference between the death penalty in theory (killing the worst, absolutely guilty criminals) and in actual practice (a badly flawed government program that wastes millions and makes mistakes).

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Christopher Preble, the vice president for defense and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, discusses Donald Trump’s suggestion that the US shouldn’t necessarily defend NATO allies if they were attacked by Russia; how a US security guarantee encourages other NATO countries to act more recklessly and neglect their own military spending; and the outcry against Trump’s comment by Republicans, Democrats and European leaders.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download